A comparison of single-cycle versus multiple-cycle proof testing strategies
Read Online
Share

A comparison of single-cycle versus multiple-cycle proof testing strategies

  • 594 Want to read
  • ·
  • 19 Currently reading

Published by National Aeronautics and Space Administration, Marshall Space Flight Center, National Technical Information Service, distributor in [Marshall Space Flight Center], Ala, [Springfield, Va .
Written in English

Subjects:

  • Fracture mechanics.,
  • Crack propagation.,
  • Surface cracks.,
  • Notch strength.,
  • J integral.,
  • Fatigue tests.,
  • Notch tests.,
  • Structural analysis.

Book details:

Edition Notes

Other titlesComparison of single cycle versus multiple cycle proof testing strategies.
StatementR.C. McClung ... [et al.].
Series[NASA contractor report] -- NASA/CR-1999-209426., NASA contractor report -- NASA CR-209426.
ContributionsMcClung, R. C., George C. Marshall Space Flight Center.
The Physical Object
FormatMicroform
Pagination1 v.
ID Numbers
Open LibraryOL18137760M

Download A comparison of single-cycle versus multiple-cycle proof testing strategies

PDF EPUB FB2 MOBI RTF

Get this from a library! A comparison of single-cycle versus multiple-cycle proof testing strategies: final report. [R C McClung; United States. National Aeronautics and Space Administration.;]. Get this from a library! A comparison of single-cycle versus multiple-cycle proof testing strategies. [S J Hudak; United States. National Aeronautics and Space Administration. Scientific and Technical Information Division.;]. CS Page 7 Bressoud Spring Pipelining the MIPS ISA What makes it easy all instructions are the same length (32 bits) - can fetch in the 1st stage and decode in the 2nd stage few instruction formats (three) with symmetry across formats - can begin reading register file in 2nd stage memory operations can occur only in loads and storesFile Size: KB. S. J. Hudak has written: 'A comparison of single-cycle versus multiple-cycle proof testing strategies' -- subject(s): Surface cracks, Crack propagation Asked in Space Aliens What is the ISBN of.

81 Single vs. Multi-cycle Implementation • Single cycle design is simple • But it’s inefficient • Why? • All instructions have same clock cycle length - they all take the same amount of time regardless of what they actually do • Clock cycle determined by longest path – Load: uses IM, RF, ALU, DM, RF in sequence • But others may be shorterFile Size: KB. COMPARISON OF SINGLE CYCLE VS MULTI CYCLE CPU As its name implies, the multiple cycle cpu requires multiple cycles to execute a single instruction. This means that our cpi will be greater than 1. The big advantage of the multi-cycle design is that we can use more or less cycles to execute each instruction, depending on the File Size: KB. George C. Marshall Space Flight Center. Books from the extended shelves: A Comparison of single-cycle versus multiple-cycle proof testing strategies / (Washington, George C. Marshall Space Flight Center: Testing and environmental exposure of parachute materials for the solid rocket booster decelerator subsystem /. For a single cycle implementation it is to be expected that the clock frequency (determined by the longest delay through all access times and the logic) will be lower than for a multi-cycle implementation (where, presumambly, in each cycle only a part of the total data path of the single-cycle approach will be used).

A Comparison of Single-Cycle Versus Multiple-Cycle Proof Testing Strategies. Contractor Report No. Contractor Report No. Washington, D.C.: National Aeronautics and Space by: Available in the National Library of Australia collection. Author: McClung, Merle Steven; Format: Book, Microform, Online; 11 p. Single-cycle and multiple-cycle proof testing (SCPT and MCPT) strategies for reusable aerospace propulsion system components are critically evaluated and compared from a rigorous elastic-plastic. Full text of "NASA Technical Reports Server (NTRS) Scientific and Technical Reports, Articles, Papers, and Presentations" See other formats.